Main page — MSU Benchmark Collection

MSU Metrics Robustness Benchmark

Powered by
Project head: Anastasia Antsiferova
G&M Lab head: Dr. Dmitriy Vatolin
Measurements, analysis:
Aleksandr Gushchin, Kirill Malyshev,
Khaled Abud, Ekaterina Shumitskaya,
Vyacheslav Napadovsky,
Sergey Lavrushkin, Maksim Velikanov

Key features

  • 40+ no-reference and full-reference image/video-quality metrics
  • 9 adversarial attacks including gradient-based, Universal Adversarial Perturbation-based and Perceptual-aware attacks
  • 6 training and testing datasets
  • Automatic cloud-based pipeline for evaluations

GitHub repo
arxiv.org paper
AAAI 2024 paper

News

  • 14.09.2024 Added 23 new metrics, including full-reference ones! Check the new results in Leaderboard
  • 09.12.2023 Our paper was accepted for AAAI 2024, an A* conference in artificial intelligence!
  • 06.07.2023 Updated visualisations and structure of the benchmark webpage
  • 07.06.2023 Benchmark Release!

Main results

This chart compares metrics’ robustness at different levels of proxy metrics loss. We show the mean robustness score for two groups of adversarial attacks and the mean SSIM measured between original and attacked images. We averaged the resulting scores for images and frames from all test datasets. See Leaderboard for more results.

How to submit your IQA/VQA metric

Compare the robustness of your method to adversarial attacks with existing quality assessment metrics.
We kindly invite you to participate in our benchmark. To do this follow the steps below:

Send us an email to mrb@videoprocessing.ai with the following information:
    A. Your method name that will be specified in our benchmark
    B. Your method launch scipt with the following options (or their analogs)
      -ref — path to reference video (for full-reference metrics)
      -dist — path to distorted video
      -output — path to output of your algorithm
      -t — threshold, if it's required in your algorithm
    C. (Optional) Any additional information about the method:
      1. The parameters set that you want us to use
      2. A link to the paper about your model
      3. Any characteristics of your model's architecture
You can verify the results of current participants or estimate the perfomance of your method using the
code provided on our GitHub page.

Cite us

@article{
Antsiferova_Abud_Gushchin_Shumitskaya_Lavrushkin_Vatolin_2024,
title={Comparing the robustness of modern no-reference image- and video-quality metrics to adversarial attacks},
author={Antsiferova, Anastasia and Abud, Khaled and Gushchin, Aleksandr and Shumitskaya, Ekaterina and Lavrushkin, Sergey and Vatolin, Dmitriy},
journal={Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence},
volume={38},
url={https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/27827},
DOI={10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27827},
number={2},
year={2024},
month={Mar.},
pages={700-708}
}

Contacts

We would highly appreciate any suggestions and ideas on improving our benchmark. Please get in touch with us via email: mrb@videoprocessing.ai


MSU Video Quality Measurement Tool

              

    The tool for performing video/image quality analyses using reference or no-reference metrics

Widest Range of Metrics & Formats

  • Modern & Classical Metrics SSIM, MS-SSIM, PSNR, VMAF and 10+ more
  • Non-reference analysis & video characteristics
    Blurring, Blocking, Noise, Scene change detection, NIQE and more

Fastest Video Quality Measurement

  • GPU support
    Up to 11.7x faster calculation of metrics with GPU
  • Real-time measure
  • Unlimited file size

    • Main MSU VQMT page on compression.ru

07 Jun 2023
See Also
PSNR and SSIM: application areas and criticism
Learn about limits and applicability of the most popular metrics
Learning-Based Image Compression Benchmark
The First extensive comparison of Learned Image Compression algorithms
Super-Resolution for Video Compression Benchmark
Learn about the best SR methods for compressed videos and choose the best model to use with your codec
Video Colorization Benchmark
Explore the best video colorization algorithms
Defenses for Image Quality Metrics Benchmark
Explore defenses from adv attacks
Super-Resolution Quality Metrics Benchmark
Discover 66 Super-Resolution Quality Metrics and choose the most appropriate for your videos
Site structure
MSU Graphics & Media Lab Video Group
2019–2022