Lossless Video Codecs Comparison ‘2007
- Project head: Dr. Dmitriy Vatolin
 - Testing, analysis: Iwan Seleznev
 - Verification: Dr. Maxim Smirnov
 
Tested codecs
- Alpary
 - ArithYuv
 - AVIzlib
 - CamStudio GZIP
 - CorePNG
 - FastCodec
 - FFV1
 - Huffyuv
 - Lagarith
 - LOCO
 - LZO
 - MSU Lab
 - PICVideo
 - Snow
 - x264
 - YULS
 
Comparison Content
The main goal of the performed comparison is getting answers on the following questions regarding lossless video codecs:
- What codec or codecs are best for video capture and video editing applications?
 - What codec or codecs achieve the best compression ratio?
 - What advantages multithreading gives to modern codecs supporting it?
 
Only absolutely lossless codecs were examined in this comparison. Only progressive test video sequences were used.
Main conclusions:
- In Video Capture and Video Editing Area the overall clear winner is Lagarith.
 - In Maximum Compression area the overall winner is YULS.
 - The most balanced and flexible codec is FFV1: relatively good speed and high compression for various presets.
 
The comparison paper is 130 pages long and contains a lot of graphs to facilitate analysis like this one:
        Download
Lossless Codecs Comparison ‘2007 - PDF (1.71 Mb)
Lossless Codecs Comparison ‘2007 - ZIP (1.5 Mb)
Contacts
        See Also
      
      Video Saliency Prediction Benchmark
          Explore the best video saliency prediction (VSP) algorithms
        
        
          
          Call for HEVC codecs 2019
          Fourteen modern video codec comparison
        
        
          
          HEVC Video Codecs Comparison 2018 (Thirteen MSU Video Codec Comparison)
          13th MSU video codecs comparison
        
        
          
          HEVC Video Codecs Comparison 2017 (Twelfth MSU Video Codec Comparison)
          12th MSU video codecs comparison
        
        
          
          MSU Video Codec Comparisons (6 test of lossless, MPEG-4 and MPEG-4 AVC)
          
        
        
          
          Call for HEVC codecs 2018
          
        
      
        Site structure
        
    - 
            MSU Benchmark Collection
            
- Video Saliency Prediction Benchmark
 - LEHA-CVQAD Video Quality Metrics Benchmark
 - Learning-Based Image Compression Benchmark
 - Super-Resolution for Video Compression Benchmark
 - Video Colorization Benchmark
 - Defenses for Image Quality Metrics Benchmark
 - Super-Resolution Quality Metrics Benchmark
 - Deinterlacer Benchmark
 - Metrics Robustness Benchmark
 - Video Upscalers Benchmark
 - Video Deblurring Benchmark
 - Video Frame Interpolation Benchmark
 - HDR Video Reconstruction Benchmark
 - No-Reference Video Quality Metrics Benchmark
 - Full-Reference Video Quality Metrics Benchmark
 - Video Alignment and Retrieval Benchmark
 - Mobile Video Codecs Benchmark
 - Video Super-Resolution Benchmark
 - Shot Boundary Detection Benchmark
 - The VideoMatting Project
 - Video Completion
 
 - Codecs Comparisons & Optimization
 - VQMT
 - MSU Datasets Collection
 - Metrics Research
 - Video Quality Measurement Tool 3D
 - Video Filters
 - Other Projects