VQMT3D Project: Report 6 on 3D-video Quality Analysis

In cooperation with IITP RAS

About the Report

The sixth report is dedicated to the analysis of stereo-window violation issue and use of floating windows in various S3D movies. The report presents detailed (415 pages) evaluation results of 10 S3D films, which were natively captured or post-converted.

Download report

Analysed films

Examined problems:

  • The Amazing Spiderman (2012)
  • The Three Musketeers (2011)
  • Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011)
  • Dolphin Tale (2011)
  • Drive Angry (2011)
  • The Avengers (2012)
  • John Carter (2012)
  • G-Force (2009)
  • Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter (2012)
  • Clash of the Titans (2010)
  • Stereo-window violation

The report comprises three main parts:

  1. We thoroughly describe the stereo-window violation effect and how it can be fixed using a floating-window technique. Next we provide a brief explanation of how to understand charts and visualizations in this report.
  2. We offer a detailed analysis of 10 films. This analysis comprises per-frame charts showing floating- window and closest-object disparities for both the left and right borders of the screen. Visualizations of frames with the most noticeable stereo-window violations are provided under the corresponding charts.
  3. The report concludes with an overall film comparison. Here, we show charts depicting the noticeability of stereo-window violations and the intensity of floating-window use for each film.

In appendix we present our analysis of slant floating-window use in selected S3D films and a relatively uncommon technique that we call the letterbox-violation effect.

Example of a stereo-window violation

Example of a stereo-window violation fixed by means of the floating window technique

Professional stereographers contributed to the analysis with valuable comments and feedbacks.

Contributed Stereographers

(in alphabetical order; for main part of the report)

Overall evaluation results

In this section we present selected overall comparison charts.

Please, read more about the charts and particular films in the report.

Stereo Window Violation vs. Release Date

Stereo Window Violation vs. Floating Window Usage Intensity

Stereo Window Violation vs. Closest Object Disparity

Publications

If you want to make a reference to this project, please refer to one of the following publications:

  1. Mikhail Erofeev, Dmitriy Vatolin, Alexander Voronov, Alexey Fedorov,
    “Toward an Objective Stereo-Video Quality Metric: Depth Perception of Textured Areas,”
    International Conference on 3D Imaging,
    2012. doi:10.1109/IC3D.2012.6615120 (download)
  2. Dmitriy Akimov, Alexey Shestov, Alexander Voronov, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “Automatic Left-Right Channel Swap Detection,”
    International Conference on 3D Imaging,
    2012. doi:10.1109/IC3D.2012.6615126 (download)
  3. Alexander Voronov, Alexey Borisov, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “System for automatic detection of distorted scenes in stereo video,”
    International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronic (VPQM-2012),
    pp. 138–143, 2012. (download)
  4. Alexander Voronov, Dmitriy Vatolin, Denis Sumin, Vyacheslav Napadovsky, Alexey Borisov,
    “Towards Automatic Stereo-video Quality Assessment and Detection of Color and Sharpness Mismatch,”
    International Conference on 3D Imaging,
    2012. doi:10.1109/IC3D.2012.6615121 (download)
  5. Alexander Voronov, Dmitriy Vatolin, Denis Sumin, Vyacheslav Napadovsky, Alexey Borisov,
    “Methodology for stereoscopic motion-picture quality assessment,”
    Proc. SPIE 8648, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXIV,
    vol. 8648, pp. 864810-1–864810-14, 2013. doi:10.1117/12.2008485 (download)
  6. Alexander Bokov, Dmitriy Vatolin, Anton Zachesov, Alexander Belous, Mikhail Erofeev,
    “Automatic detection of artifacts in converted S3D video,”
    Proc. SPIE 9011, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXV (March 6, 2014),
    vol. 901112, 2014. doi:10.1117/12.2054330 (download)
  7. Stanislav Dolganov, Mikhail Erofeev, Dmitriy Vatolin, Yury Gitman,
    “Detection of stuck-to-background objects in converted S3D movies,”
    2015 International Conference on 3D Imaging, IC3D 2015,
    2015. doi:10.1109/IC3D.2015.7391839 (download)
  8. Yury Gitman, Can Bal, Mikhail Erofeev, Ankit Jain, Sergey Matyunin, Kyoung-Rok Lee, Alexander Voronov, Jason Juang, Dmitriy Vatolin, Truong Nguyen,
    “Delivering Enhanced 3D Video,”
    Intel Technology Journal,
    vol. 19, pp. 162–200, 2015. (download)
  9. Dmitriy Vatolin, Alexander Bokov, Mikhail Erofeev, Vyacheslav Napadovsky,
    “Trends in S3D-Movie Quality Evaluated on 105 Films Using 10 Metrics,”
    Proceedings of Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXVII,
    pp. SDA-439.1–SDA-439.10, 2016. doi:10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.5.SDA-439 (download)
  10. Alexander Bokov, Sergey Lavrushkin, Mikhail Erofeev, Dmitriy Vatolin, Alexey Fedorov,
    “Toward fully automatic channel-mismatch detection and discomfort prediction for S3D video,”
    2016 International Conference on 3D Imaging (IC3D),
    2016. doi:10.1109/IC3D.2016.7823462 (download)
  11. Dmitriy Vatolin, Sergey Lavrushkin,
    “Investigating and predicting the perceptibility protect of channel mismatch in stereoscopic video,”
    Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics,
    vol. 40, pp. 185–191, 2016. doi:10.3103/s0278641916040075 (download)
  12. Anastasia Antsiferova, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “The influence of 3D video artifacts on discomfort of 302 viewers,”
    2017 International Conference on 3D Immersion (IC3D),
    2017. doi:10.1109/IC3D.2017.8251897 (download)
  13. Dmitriy Vatolin, Alexander Bokov,
    “Sharpness Mismatch and 6 Other Stereoscopic Artifacts Measured on 10 Chinese S3D Movies,”
    Proceedings of Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXVIII,
    pp. 137–144, 2017. doi:10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.5.SDA-340 (download)
  14. Sergey Lavrushkin, Vitaliy Lyudvichenko, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “Local Method of Color-Difference Correction Between Stereoscopic-Video Views,”
    Proceedings of the 2018 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON),
    2018. doi:10.1109/3DTV.2018.8478453 (download)
  15. Aidar Khatiullin, Mikhail Erofeev, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “Fast Occlusion Filling Method For Multiview Video Generation,”
    Proceedings of the 2018 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON),
    2018. doi:10.1109/3DTV.2018.8478562 (download)
  16. Sergey Lavrushkin, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “Channel-Mismatch Detection Algorithm for Stereoscopic Video Using Convolutional Neural Network,”
    Proceedings of the 2018 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON),
    2018. doi:10.1109/3DTV.2018.8478542 (download)
  17. Alexander Ploshkin, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “Accurate Method of Temporal Shift Estimation for 3D Video,”
    Proceedings of the 2018 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON),
    2018. doi:10.1109/3DTV.2018.8478431 (download)
  18. Sergey Lavrushkin, Konstantin Kozhemyakov, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “Neural-Network-Based Detection Methods for Color, Sharpness, and Geometry Artifacts in Stereoscopic and VR180 Videos,”
    International Conference on 3D Immersion (IC3D),
    2020. doi:10.1109/IC3D51119.2020.9376385 (download)
  19. Kirill Malyshev, Sergey Lavrushkin, Dmitriy Vatolin,
    “Stereoscopic Dataset from A Video Game: Detecting Converged Axes and Perspective Distortions in S3D Videos,”
    International Conference on 3D Immersion (IC3D),
    2020. doi:10.1109/IC3D51119.2020.9376375 (download)
  20. Lavrushkin Sergey, Molodetskikh Ivan, Kozhemyakov Konstantin, Vatolin Dmitriy,
    “Stereoscopic quality assessment of 1,000 VR180 videos using 8 metrics,”
    Electronic Imaging, 3D Measurement and Data Processing,
    2021. doi:10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2021.2.sda-350 (download)

Reports overview

Stereo-analysis project description

Report 1 (S3D shooting quality analysis of 5 movies) Download
(Additional info for bloggers and press)
Pages: 246
Figures: 295
Report 2 (S3D shooting quality analysis of 5 movies) Download
(Additional info for bloggers and press)
Pages: 342
Figures: 442
Report 3 (2D-3D conversion quality analysis of 5 movies) Download
(Additional info for bloggers and press)
Pages: 305
Figures: 336
Report 4 (S3D shooting quality analysis of 5 movies) Download Pages: 301
Figures: 402
Report 5 (2D-3D conversion quality analysis of 5 movies) Download
(Additional info for bloggers and press)
Pages: 384
Figures: 404
Report 6 (Stereo Window analysis of 10 movies) Download
(Additional info for bloggers and press)
Pages: 415
Figures: 455
Report 7 (Stereo Window analysis of 10 movies) Download
(Additional info for bloggers and press)
Pages: 333
Figures: 348
Report 8 (Rotate Analysis, Temporal Shift, Channels Swap, Zoom Mismatch in 25 movies) Download
(Additional info for bloggers and press)
Pages: 366
Figures: 361
Report 9 (Temporal Shift, Stuck-to-Background Objects, 2D to S3D conversion in Captured Films) Download
(Additional info for bloggers and press)
Pages: 467
Figures: 529
Report 10 (Overall analysis of 105 movies) Download Pages: 211
Figures: 270
Report 11 (Overall analysis of 10 selected Chinese movies) Download Pages: 322
Figures: 566
Report 12 (VR180 Quality Analysis) Download Pages: 348
Figures: 362

Download

Full report (415 pages) is absolutely free but download is available only for industry professionals (due to publication of real mistakes in the post-production process).

To download the report, please fill-in the request form.
You will get the download link for all reports (Reports #1–11) via e-mail.

All materials in this evaluation are used for research purposes and in accordance with Fair Use conditions. This evaluation is not published widely, but it is available for free under a subscription for stereoscopy and cinema technology professionals.

Feedback

Do you have any feedback on previous reports? What did you find useful, or was anything lacking?

What would you like to see in future reports (analysis of certain films, different metrics, charts and visualizations, etc.)?

We are open to collaboration. If you are interested in working with us, please write your propositions:

Any other feedback that doesn't fit in previous fields:

Contacts

For questions and proposition please contact us 3dmovietest@graphics.cs.msu.ru

22 Oct 2014
See Also
Super-Resolution for Video Compression Benchmark
Learn about the best SR methods for compressed videos and choose the best model to use with your codec
MSU 3D-video Quality Analysis. Report 12
MSU 3D-video Quality Analysis. Report 11
MSU 3D-video Quality Analysis. Report 10
Detection of stereo window violation
How to find objects that are present only in one view?
Depth continuity estimation in S3D video
How smooth is the depth transition between scenes?
Site structure